top of page

Analysis of G-Med Physician Posts and Comments on the Topic of Parkinson's

Topics/keywords: ‘parkinson’s’

Data types: posts, comments, likes, polls

Geographical segment: global physicians, physicians by region

Analyzed data points on G-Med: 2,832

Specialties: Neurology, Family Medicine, Psychiatry

Countries analyzed: 55

Reach: 56,203

Introduction

This report presents an analysis of global physician discussions related to Parkinson’s disease on the G-Med platform. Using structured keyword identification, sentiment assessment, and country-based segmentation, the report identifies prominent themes across diagnosis, treatment, and long-term management. The analysis is derived exclusively from unique posts and comments shared by physicians, representing their real-world perspectives and clinical experiences.

Main Concerns of G-Med Physicians on the Topic of Parkinson’s Disease

Screenshot 2024-09-26 104230.png
  • Cognitive Decline and Dementia (22% of physician      discussions)
        Physicians frequently addressed concerns related to memory loss, cognitive deterioration, and progression to dementia.

    • 65% of these discussions conveyed a positive outlook toward monitoring and managing cognitive changes.

    • 35% expressed concern over limited treatment options and rapid progression in some patients.

  • Diagnosis Challenges (16%)
        Complex differential diagnoses were a key focus, particularly in      distinguishing Parkinson’s disease from other movement disorders.

    • 59% of discussions showed confidence in the utility of imaging in ruling out differential diagnoses (e.g., MRI, DAT scans).

    • 41% expressed frustration with diagnostic uncertainty, especially       in the absence of a gold standard and in early or atypical presentations.

  • Non-Motor Symptoms (9%)
    Sleep disturbances, depression, and fatigue were frequently cited as burdensome and poorly controlled. While many physicians discussing non-motor symptoms expressed some optimism or support for existing management strategies, comments often reflected limited treatment efficacy for symptoms like sleep disturbance and fatigue.

  • Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) (6%)
    DBS was raised as a potential option in complex or treatment-resistant cases.

    • 62% of physicians expressed positive sentiment about DBS efficacy or potential benefits.

    • 38% raised concerns about its invasiveness or patient  selection criteria, with many posts highlighting its limited accessibility, especially outside high-income regions.

  • Medication Efficacy and Side Effects (6%)
        Discussions revolved around the balance between symptom control and  drug-related complications.

    • 57% expressed satisfaction with pharmacological response, especially to levodopa.

    • 43% noted adverse effects or tolerance over time.

  • Motor Symptom Management (5%)
        Focus areas included tremor, rigidity, and bradykinesia.

    • 76% of physicians expressed positive views on controlling these symptoms.

    • 24% noted challenges, especially in refractory or late-stage cases.

  • Advanced Therapies and Device Use (3%)
        A minority referenced devices like pumps or patch infusions for advanced Parkinson’s.

  • Age-Related Treatment Considerations (3%):
    Physicians discussed age as a factor in diagnosis, treatment decisions, and symptom progression.

o Posts noted challenges in managing Parkinson’s in elderly patients, including medication tolerability and risk of cognitive decline.

o Concerns were raisedabout under-recognizing early-onset cases in younger individuals.

Screenshot 2024-09-26 104230.png

Key Points on Diagnosis, Treatment, and Follow-Up

Screenshot 2024-09-26 104230.png

Diagnosis (17% of physician discussions)

· Differential Diagnosis and Imaging: MRI and DAT scans were commonly mentioned as tools to confirm or rule out Parkinson’s. Sentiment was divided: 59% expressed confidence in these tools, 41% noted limitations or access issues.

· Diagnostic Uncertainty: Some cases highlighted confusion due to atypical symptom presentation or overlapping disorders.

Treatment (10% of physician discussions)

  • Levodopa and Medication Use: The gold-standard treatment remained a core discussion point. 57% favored it for symptom      control, while 43% expressed concern about side effects or “wearing off”  periods.

  • Advanced Therapy Options: Therapies like apomorphine infusion or duodopa pump were discussed, though rarely. Mixed sentiments      were apparent: concerns about complexity vs. benefits in severe disease.

  • Deep Brain Stimulation: Though discussed infrequently, DBS was viewed favorably in select cases. Some physicians noted its role in managing medication-refractory symptoms, but many also acknowledged accessibility challenges and the need for careful patient selection.

Follow-Up (20% of physician discussions)

  • Tracking Cognitive Decline: Physicians emphasized routine      assessment for cognitive deterioration. 65% described benefit from early detection and interventions; 35% cited therapeutic gaps.

  • Monitoring Motor Symptoms: Physicians advocated for      longitudinal tracking of core symptoms like tremors and rigidity.

  • Medication Response Over Time: A small percentage of      discussions focused on fluctuations in drug effectiveness, particularly      “on-off” patterns.

Screenshot 2024-09-26 104230.png

Geographical Analysis of Physician Discussions on Parkinson’s Disease

Screenshot 2024-09-26 104230.png

Of the 55 countries analyzed, the following topics were discussed in prominent countries:

  • United States: Emphasized motor symptom control, confident use of DBS, and frequent reliance on imaging (e.g., MRI, DAT scans).

  • France: Focused on cognitive decline and dementia. Cautious      sentiment toward DBS and mixed views on imaging use.

  • United Kingdom: Prioritized cognitive screening and clinical diagnosis over imaging. Cautious approach to DBS.

  • Australia: Balanced focus on motor and non-motor symptoms.      High DBS confidence and strong use of imaging in diagnosis.

  • Germany: Strong support for imaging-based diagnosis and DBS, with frequent discussion of tremor management.

  • Spain: Cautious toward DBS. Emphasis on medication-related side effects and clinical diagnosis methods.

  • Canada: Balanced discussions on motor and cognitive symptoms.      Imaging used selectively; DBS sentiment generally positive.

  • Italy: Emphasized motor symptoms and levodopa. Moderate      support for DBS; cognitive issues less discussed.

Cross-Country Differences in Parkinson’s Disease Management

This section highlights key differences in physician discussions across countries, reflecting diverse approaches to Parkinson’s diagnosis and management. The findings are drawn from thematic and sentiment-based analysis and visualized in the accompanying heatmap.

1. Confidence vs. Caution Toward Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)

This theme contrasts regions where physicians are confident in the use of DBS versus those expressing caution regarding its risks and indications.

  • Confidence in DBS
    Most prominent in the United States, Australia, and Germany,      where physicians shared favorable experiences with DBS, particularly for managing tremors and medication-resistant motor symptoms.

  • Caution Toward DBS
        More common in the United Kingdom, France, and Spain,      where physicians emphasized the need for careful patient selection and      noted the invasive nature of the procedure.

2. Cognitive-Focused vs. Motor-Focused Management

This theme examines whether discussions were oriented more toward managing cognitive symptoms or traditional motor presentations of Parkinson’s.

  • Cognitive Focus
        Dominated discussions in the United Kingdom and France,      where physicians regularly highlighted memory loss, dementia progression, and mental status monitoring as key concerns.

  • Motor Focus
        More prominent in the United States, Italy, Germany, and Australia, where tremors, rigidity, and bradykinesia were central to treatment plans and follow-up routines.

3. Imaging-Supported vs. Clinical Diagnosis Preference

This theme reflects how physicians approach the diagnostic process, either emphasizing imaging modalities or relying more heavily on clinical evaluation.

  • Imaging-Supported Diagnosis
    Strongly represented in the United States, Germany, and Australia,      with frequent references to MRI and DAT scan use to exclude differential diagnosis.

  • Clinical Diagnosis Priority
        Evident in Spain and the United Kingdom, where physicians      leaned more on clinical judgment and patient history due to concerns over cost, access, or interpretation of imaging.

Screenshot 2024-09-26 104230.png

Engagement Recommendations:

Screenshot 2024-09-26 104230.png
  • As can be seen from the report, there are some knowledge gaps on the topic of Parkinson’s disease, especially surrounding cognitive symptom management, DBS  candidate selection, and non-motor symptom integration. An awareness campaign could be beneficial in this case.

  • G-Med's Awareness Package could be a good fit here.

Screenshot 2024-09-26 104230.png

Screenshot 2024-09-26 104230.png
Screenshot 2024-09-26 104230.png
bottom of page